University of Tokyo science mathematics 2015: problems and solutions

Original publication: Updated:

These are this site's independently written solutions to the 2015 science-track mathematics paper, not official University of Tokyo answers. Difficulty comments and score-planning suggestions are the original author's retrospective judgments, not admissions thresholds. For an approach to reviewing past papers, see the textbook review.

Problem 1: the region swept by a family of parabolas

For every positive real aa, consider

Ca:y=ax2+1−4a24a.C_a:\quad y=ax^2+\frac{1-4a^2}{4a}.

Describe the region swept out as aa ranges over all positive real numbers.

Strategy and difficulty

This is a standard region problem. You can either fix xx and find the range of yy, or ask whether a proposed point gives an admissible positive solution for aa. The first approach keeps the cases particularly transparent; see swept regions.

Solution

Fix xx and write

y=fx(a)=(x2−1)a+14a,a>0.y=f_x(a)=(x^2-1)a+\frac1{4a},\qquad a>0.

Its derivative is fx′(a)=x2−1−1/(4a2)f_x'(a)=x^2-1-1/(4a^2).

If ∣x∣<1|x|<1, the function is strictly decreasing, tends to +∞+\infty as a→0+a\to0+, and tends to −∞-\infty as a→∞a\to\infty. Continuity therefore gives every real yy.

If ∣x∣=1|x|=1, it is 1/(4a)1/(4a), whose range is (0,∞)(0,\infty).

If ∣x∣>1|x|>1, its derivative changes from negative to positive at

a=12x2−1,a=\frac1{2\sqrt{x^2-1}},

where the attained minimum is x2−1\sqrt{x^2-1}. Both endpoint limits are +∞+\infty, so its range is [x2−1,∞)[\sqrt{x^2-1},\infty).

Consequently, the swept region is

{y∈R∣x∣<1,y>0∣x∣=1,y≥x2−1∣x∣>1.\boxed{\begin{cases} y\in\mathbb R&|x|<1,\\ y>0&|x|=1,\\ y\ge\sqrt{x^2-1}&|x|>1. \end{cases}}

The curved boundary is included, while (±1,0)(\pm1,0) and the nonpositive parts of x=±1x=\pm1 are excluded. The source's strict inequality in the third case is a typo: the minimum is attained.

Swept region: the whole open strip between x=-1 and x=1, together with the upper exterior branches above the boundary curve.

Animation of the moving parabola and the region it sweeps.

Problem 2: random strings of unequal-length blocks

Roll a fair die repeatedly, appending a block at each roll: outcomes 1, 2, or 3 append AA, outcome 4 appends B, outcome 5 appends C, and outcome 6 appends D. For example, rolls 2,5,6,3,42,5,6,3,4 produce AACDAAB.

  1. After n≥1n\ge1 rolls, find the probability that the nnth character from the left is A.
  2. For n≥2n\ge2, find the probability that the (n−1)(n-1)st character is A and the nnth is B.

Strategy and difficulty

This is a standard probability-recurrence problem with an important modeling choice: condition on the first block, not just the last roll. After nn rolls there are at least nn characters, so later appends cannot alter the character positions in question.

Part 1

Let the requested probability be pnp_n. For a target position n+2n+2, the first block has length one with probability 1/21/2, leaving target position n+1n+1 in the remaining string, or length two with probability 1/21/2, leaving position nn. Thus

pn+2=12pn+1+12pn.p_{n+2}=\frac12p_{n+1}+\frac12p_n.

The initial values are p1=1/2p_1=1/2 and p2=3/4p_2=3/4. For the latter, either the first block is AA, or it is a one-character block followed by AA.

The recurrence yields

pn+2−pn+1=−12(pn+1−pn),p_{n+2}-p_{n+1}=-\frac12(p_{n+1}-p_n), pn+2+12pn+1=pn+1+12pn.p_{n+2}+\frac12p_{n+1}=p_{n+1}+\frac12p_n.

Hence

pn+1−pn=(−12)n+1,pn+1+12pn=1.p_{n+1}-p_n=\left(-\frac12\right)^{n+1},\qquad p_{n+1}+\frac12p_n=1.

Eliminating pn+1p_{n+1} gives

pn=23{1−(−12)n+1}.\boxed{p_n=\frac23\left\{1-\left(-\frac12\right)^{n+1}\right\}.}

Part 2

Let qnq_n be the probability of AB at positions n−1,nn-1,n. The same first-block split gives qn+2=(qn+1+qn)/2q_{n+2}=(q_{n+1}+q_n)/2 for n≥2n\ge2.

We have q2=0q_2=0: a string cannot begin AB because A arrives only in a double block. Also q3=1/12q_3=1/12, obtained by first appending AA and then B. Therefore

qn+1−qn=112(−12)n−2,qn+1+12qn=112.q_{n+1}-q_n=\frac1{12}\left(-\frac12\right)^{n-2}, \qquad q_{n+1}+\frac12q_n=\frac1{12}.

Solving,

qn=118{1−(−12)n−2}(n≥2).\boxed{q_n=\frac1{18}\left\{1-\left(-\frac12\right)^{n-2}\right\}\quad(n\ge2).}

The recurrence guide explains these two geometric combinations.

Problem 3: a power curve and a logarithm meet once

Let a>0a>0 and let pp be a positive rational number. Suppose y=axpy=ax^p and y=log⁡xy=\log x, for x>0x>0, have exactly one common point QQ.

  1. Express aa and the xx-coordinate of QQ in terms of pp.
  2. Find the volume formed by rotating the region bounded by these two curves and the xx-axis about the xx-axis.
  3. Find pp when that volume is 2π2\pi.

You may use xp/log⁡x→∞x^p/\log x\to\infty as x→∞x\to\infty without proof.

Part 1: separate the parameter

Rather than trying to solve axp=log⁡xax^p=\log x explicitly, write

a=F(x)=log⁡xxp,F′(x)=1−plog⁡xxp+1.a=F(x)=\frac{\log x}{x^p},\qquad F'(x)=\frac{1-p\log x}{x^{p+1}}.

The function increases up to x=e1/px=e^{1/p} and decreases afterward. It tends to −∞-\infty at zero, is zero at one, has maximum 1/(ep)1/(ep), and tends to zero from above at infinity.

The function log(x)/x to the power p and a horizontal line at its unique maximum.

For positive aa, a unique intersection occurs precisely at the maximum. Therefore

a=1ep,Q=(e1/p,1p).\boxed{a=\frac1{ep},\qquad Q=\left(e^{1/p},\frac1p\right).}

The positive condition on aa matters: nonpositive horizontal levels have different intersection behavior.

Part 2: disks followed by washers

On 0≤x≤10\le x\le1 the lower boundary is the axis, while on 1≤x≤e1/p1\le x\le e^{1/p} it is log⁡x\log x. The power curve provides the upper boundary throughout.

The region between the power curve, the horizontal axis up to x=1, and the logarithm from x=1 to the tangency point.

Put E=e1/pE=e^{1/p}. The volume is

V=πa2∫0Ex2p dx−π∫1E(log⁡x)2 dx.V=\pi a^2\int_0^Ex^{2p}\,dx-\pi\int_1^E(\log x)^2\,dx.

The first term is πE/(p2(2p+1))\pi E/(p^2(2p+1)). Integration by parts twice gives

∫(log⁡x)2 dx=x{(log⁡x)2−2log⁡x+2}+C.\int(\log x)^2\,dx=x\{(\log x)^2-2\log x+2\}+C.

Thus

Vπ=Ep2(2p+1)−E(1p2−2p+2)+2=2(1−2p)1+2pe1/p+2.\begin{aligned} \frac V\pi &=\frac{E}{p^2(2p+1)}-E\left(\frac1{p^2}-\frac2p+2\right)+2\\ &=\frac{2(1-2p)}{1+2p}e^{1/p}+2. \end{aligned}

Therefore

V=π{2(1−2p)1+2pe1/p+2}.\boxed{V=\pi\left\{\frac{2(1-2p)}{1+2p}e^{1/p}+2\right\}.}

Part 3

Since the exponential and denominator are positive, V=2πV=2\pi exactly when 1−2p=01-2p=0. Hence

p=12.\boxed{p=\frac12.}

The initial parameter separation is the main obstacle; after it, the volume calculation is a standard application of integration by parts.

Problem 4: a nonlinear recurrence hides Fibonacci numbers

Define

p1=1,p2=2,pn+2=pn+12+1pn(n≥1).p_1=1,\qquad p_2=2,\qquad p_{n+2}=\frac{p_{n+1}^2+1}{p_n}\quad(n\ge1).
  1. Show that (pn+12+pn2+1)/(pn+1pn)(p_{n+1}^2+p_n^2+1)/(p_{n+1}p_n) is independent of nn.
  2. Express pn+1+pn−1p_{n+1}+p_{n-1} using pnp_n, for n≥2n\ge2.
  3. If q1=q2=1q_1=q_2=1 and qn+2=qn+1+qnq_{n+2}=q_{n+1}+q_n, prove pn=q2n−1p_n=q_{2n-1}.

Part 1: find the invariant

Positivity follows inductively, so all divisions are valid. Substituting the recurrence and cancelling gives

pn+22+pn+12+1pn+2pn+1=pn+12+pn2+1pn+1pn.\frac{p_{n+2}^2+p_{n+1}^2+1}{p_{n+2}p_{n+1}} =\frac{p_{n+1}^2+p_n^2+1}{p_{n+1}p_n}.

The common value is its value at n=1n=1, namely (4+1+1)/2=3(4+1+1)/2=3.

Part 2: turn it into a linear recurrence

The invariant says pn+12+pn2+1=3pn+1pnp_{n+1}^2+p_n^2+1=3p_{n+1}p_n. Replace pn+12+1p_{n+1}^2+1 by pn+2pnp_{n+2}p_n and divide by pn>0p_n>0:

pn+2+pn=3pn+1.p_{n+2}+p_n=3p_{n+1}.

Shifting the index,

pn+1+pn−1=3pn(n≥2).\boxed{p_{n+1}+p_{n-1}=3p_n\quad(n\ge2).}

This avoids a potentially zero factor pn+1−pn−1p_{n+1}-p_{n-1} that would arise from subtracting squared identities.

Part 3: compare recurrences and initial values

The odd-index Fibonacci subsequence satisfies

q2k+3=2q2k+1+q2k=2q2k+1+(q2k+1−q2k−1)=3q2k+1−q2k−1.\begin{aligned} q_{2k+3}&=2q_{2k+1}+q_{2k}\\ &=2q_{2k+1}+(q_{2k+1}-q_{2k-1})\\ &=3q_{2k+1}-q_{2k-1}. \end{aligned}

This is the same second-order recurrence as for pnp_n. The first two values match: p1=q1=1p_1=q_1=1 and p2=q3=2p_2=q_3=2. Two-step induction therefore proves

pn=q2n−1(n≥1).\boxed{p_n=q_{2n-1}\quad(n\ge1).}

The induction guide explains why two initial cases are needed.

Problem 5: the first even binomial coefficient

Find the smallest positive integer m≤2015m\le2015 for which (2015m)\binom{2015}{m} is even.

Solution

Track powers of two instead of computing huge binomial coefficients. Let v2(k)v_2(k) denote the exponent of two dividing a positive integer kk. Consecutive coefficients satisfy

(2015m)=(2015m−1)2016−mm.\binom{2015}{m}=\binom{2015}{m-1}\frac{2016-m}{m}.

For 1≤m<321\le m<32, write m=2sum=2^su with uu odd and s≤4s\le4. Since 2016=25⋅632016=2^5\cdot63,

2016−m=2s(25−s⋅63−u),2016-m=2^s(2^{5-s}\cdot63-u),

and the bracket is odd. Therefore v2(2016−m)=v2(m)v_2(2016-m)=v_2(m), so each step preserves the coefficient's two-adic valuation. Starting from (20150)=1\binom{2015}{0}=1, every coefficient through m=31m=31 is odd.

At m=32m=32,

2016−32=1984=26⋅31,v2(32)=5.2016-32=1984=2^6\cdot31,\qquad v_2(32)=5.

The valuation increases by one for the first time, giving

m=32.\boxed{m=32.}

The original solution checks the sixteen even values through 32 individually; the argument above groups those checks by their exact power of two. Either approach needs to establish that every earlier coefficient is odd. Looking only at whether a ratio is an integer would be insufficient, since the intermediate ratios can be nonintegral even when their two-adic valuation is zero.

Problem 6: concentrating integrals

For a positive integer nn, define

g(x)={(1+cos⁡πx)/2∣x∣≤1,0∣x∣>1,g(x)=\begin{cases}(1+\cos\pi x)/2&|x|\le1,\\0&|x|>1,\end{cases} h(x)={−(π/2)sin⁡πx∣x∣≤1,0∣x∣>1.h(x)=\begin{cases}-(\pi/2)\sin\pi x&|x|\le1,\\0&|x|>1.\end{cases}
  1. Let ff be continuous. If p≤f(x)≤qp\le f(x)\le q for ∣x∣≤1/n|x|\le1/n, prove
p≤n∫−11g(nx)f(x) dx≤q.p\le n\int_{-1}^{1}g(nx)f(x)\,dx\le q.
  1. Find lim⁡n→∞n2∫−11h(nx)log⁡(1+ex+1) dx\lim_{n\to\infty}n^2\int_{-1}^{1}h(nx)\log(1+e^{x+1})\,dx.

Part 1: normalize the averaging kernel

Substitute t=nxt=nx. Since g(t)=0g(t)=0 outside [−1,1][-1,1],

n∫−11g(nx)f(x) dx=∫−11g(t)f(t/n) dt.n\int_{-1}^{1}g(nx)f(x)\,dx =\int_{-1}^{1}g(t)f(t/n)\,dt.

On this interval g(t)≥0g(t)\ge0, and

∫−11g(t) dt=[t2+sin⁡πt2π]−11=1.\int_{-1}^{1}g(t)\,dt =\left[\frac t2+\frac{\sin\pi t}{2\pi}\right]_{-1}^{1}=1.

Multiplying p≤f(t/n)≤qp\le f(t/n)\le q by the nonnegative weight and integrating proves the bounds. Nonnegativity and total weight one are both essential.

Part 2: use the derivative relationship

We have g′=hg'=h, including at the endpoints, and (g(nx))′=nh(nx)(g(nx))'=nh(nx). Integration by parts gives

n2∫−11h(nx)log⁡(1+ex+1) dx=n[g(nx)log⁡(1+ex+1)]−11−n∫−11g(nx)ex+11+ex+1 dx=−n∫−11g(nx)F(x) dx,\begin{aligned} n^2\int_{-1}^{1}h(nx)\log(1+e^{x+1})\,dx &=n[g(nx)\log(1+e^{x+1})]_{-1}^{1}\\ &\quad-n\int_{-1}^{1}g(nx)\frac{e^{x+1}}{1+e^{x+1}}\,dx\\ &=-n\int_{-1}^{1}g(nx)F(x)\,dx, \end{aligned}

where F(x)=ex+1/(1+ex+1)F(x)=e^{x+1}/(1+e^{x+1}). The boundary term vanishes because g(±n)=0g(\pm n)=0 for every integer n≥1n\ge1.

Since F′(x)=ex+1/(1+ex+1)2>0F'(x)=e^{x+1}/(1+e^{x+1})^2>0, Part 1 gives

−F(1/n)≤−n∫−11g(nx)F(x) dx≤−F(−1/n).-F(1/n)\le-n\int_{-1}^{1}g(nx)F(x)\,dx\le-F(-1/n).

Both bounds tend to −F(0)-F(0). The squeeze theorem therefore gives

−e1+e.\boxed{-\frac e{1+e}.}

Reviewing this paper

The author's assessment was that Problem 5's unusual parity calculation could consume disproportionate time, while the remaining problems mostly reward familiar region, recurrence, and calculus methods. The original suggested practice targets of roughly 80–90 points for the strongest medical-track candidates and 60–70 for other science-track candidates; these are historical strategy opinions, not official requirements or predictions of admission.

A useful review records the modeling choice in each problem: fixing a coordinate, conditioning on the first block, separating a parameter, finding an invariant, tracking a prime valuation, or recognizing an averaging kernel. These decisions are more transferable than memorizing the final numerical answers.

Related articles

About the author

Koki Saito

Physician and graduate of the University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine. Drawing on his entrance-exam experience, he explains how to choose mathematical methods and construct complete solutions.

Full profile →

Have a question or spotted an error? Contact us.