How to simplify nested square roots, with three worked examples
What is a nested radical?
A nested radical contains one root inside another, such as . Sometimes it can be written as a sum or difference of simpler square roots. The key is to recognize a squared binomial rather than apply a special rule blindly.
Find two numbers from their sum and product
For real numbers ,
and
Therefore
To simplify , look for two nonnegative numbers with sum and product . They are and , so
Why the order matters for subtraction
The principal square root is nonnegative. In general , so the minus case initially gives . The assumption lets us remove the absolute value.
Writing would give a negative result and therefore cannot equal the original square root. For addition the order is immaterial, but putting the larger radicand first is a useful consistent habit.
A systematic way to find the two radicands
Suppose the expression is and we seek nonnegative rational radicands with and . Then must be the roots of
so
This explains both the sum-and-product search and its limits. For example, would require , . The resulting values are not rational. The usual technique cannot remove the nesting into square roots of rational numbers in this case; introducing those irrational radicands would merely move the nesting elsewhere.
This does not mean the expression has no other exact representation. It means the particular rational-radicand simplification we are looking for is unavailable. A perfectly valid exact answer may still contain a nested root. For more elaborate expressions, such as
do not assume that the elementary sum-and-product technique will provide a simpler form.
Example 1: a direct sum-and-product match
Problem. Simplify .
We need , . Since and ,
The result is positive. Squaring it gives , which checks the answer.
Example 2: first make the coefficient two
Problem. Simplify .
The coefficient of the inner radical is not two, so rewrite it:
The radicands and have sum . Thus
Reversing the subtraction would make the answer negative. Always check the sign as well as the squared value.
Example 3: introduce a denominator
Problem. Simplify .
Multiply the expression inside the outer root by :
Using the earlier example,
The unreationalized form is equivalent. Notice that the original expression is , not : keeping that coefficient intact is essential.
A short checking routine
Find the sum and product, put the larger square root first in a difference, and square the proposed answer. Then check that it is nonnegative. If no nonnegative rational radicands satisfy the sum-and-product conditions, keeping the original nested radical may be the clearest exact answer.
Related: equating rational and irrational parts.
Related articles
- Equating rational and irrational parts: proof and worked problems
- Conditional probability: the formula, information protocols, and worked examples
- Integration by parts: formulas, proof, and four useful patterns
- Triple-angle identities: remember, derive, and apply them
- University of Tokyo science mathematics 2020: problems and solutions
About the author
Koki Saito
Physician and graduate of the University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine. Drawing on his entrance-exam experience, he explains how to choose mathematical methods and construct complete solutions.
Full profile →Have a question or spotted an error? Contact us.