Ten recurrence patterns and how their solutions connect
A recurrence relates the terms of a sequence
A recurrence such as specifies a relationship between terms. Together with suitable initial values and domain conditions, it may define a sequence uniquely. Finding a general term means expressing directly in terms of .
The following ten patterns are a useful study map, not a classification of every possible recurrence. Many transformations aim at the same destination: a geometric sequence. Before applying one, check that reciprocals, logarithms, divisions, and implicit root choices are justified.
| Pattern | Useful transformation | | --- | --- | | Affine first order | Subtract a fixed point | | Reciprocal | Replace by | | Powers or roots | Take logarithms of positive terms | | Exponential forcing | Divide by the forcing exponential | | Constant-coefficient second order | Factor with characteristic roots | | Polynomial forcing | Subtract a polynomial particular solution | | Variable coefficients | Normalize by a suitable sequence | | Coupled recurrences | Find geometric linear combinations | | Partial sums | Subtract consecutive sum equations | | An unfamiliar implicit recurrence | Calculate, conjecture, then prove |
This table replaces the Japanese flowchart in the source article. The first few patterns connect through affine recurrences; coupled and second-order systems connect through geometric combinations; partial sums often reduce to one of these after subtraction.
1. Affine first-order recurrences
For
if , solve , giving . Subtract this identity:
so
If , use the arithmetic-sequence formula instead. If , the recurrence simply sets every term after the first equal to ; interpret that case directly without relying on an ambiguous notation.
Example
Let and . The fixed point is one, so and
For the separate arithmetic example , , the answer is .
2. A reciprocal transformation
Let
First show the recurrence is defined and nonzero. The initial term is positive; whenever , the denominator is positive and . Induction proves positivity at every step.
Set . Then
Its fixed point is three. Hence
Taking the reciprocal,
For its denominator is positive, agreeing with the domain check. A nonzero numerator alone would not justify ignoring a potentially zero recurrence denominator.
3. Powers and logarithms
Let and . Induction gives , so set . The logarithm has a valid positive base different from one, and positive arguments. Then
Thus
and
Logarithms turn a power relationship into a linear one. They are unavailable for a zero or negative real term unless the problem is reformulated appropriately.
4. Exponential forcing
For with , divide by and set :
This is affine. When , it is arithmetic instead of requiring a fixed-point subtraction.
Example
If and , then
Subtracting the fixed point gives . Therefore
For the resonant variation with the same initial value, . Hence
The term need not have coefficient one: its constant multiplier remains in the normalized recurrence.
5. Second-order constant-coefficient recurrences
For
solve the characteristic equation . If its roots are , then and , giving
Thus is geometric. Solve that recurrence first, then solve the resulting first-order equation for . This approach also adapts to a repeated characteristic root.
Example
Let , , and . The characteristic roots are and . We obtain
Subtracting the equations eliminates :
The second geometric relation comes from ; keeping the coefficient three is essential.
For distinct roots, using both relations can be faster. With a repeated nonzero root , the usual form is , with determined by the two initial values. A repeated zero root means , so and is best handled directly. Do not divide by a characteristic root before checking it is nonzero.
6. Polynomial forcing
Consider , where is a polynomial. Look for a polynomial satisfying
Then . For , a polynomial of the same degree as provides a systematic coefficient-comparison approach.
Example
Take
The source's initial-value line is incomplete, but its calculation uses , which is specified here. Set . Comparing coefficients in gives
Hence . Therefore
and
If the initial value were an unspecified , replace the geometric coefficient by .
When the coefficient is one
For , sum the differences:
With the empty-sum convention this is also valid at . Otherwise derive it for and verify the first term separately. The usual power-sum formulas and telescoping often evaluate the sum.
A polynomial particular solution still exists here, generally of one higher degree; it is the same discrete-antiderivative idea, rather than a fundamental failure of polynomial methods.
7. Variable coefficients
A normalization can remove coefficients depending on . For
divide by :
Set . Then
Thus
For the homogeneous variation , , repeated multiplication gives
This product argument is fully rigorous, and can be justified by induction. More generally, dividing by a nonzero solution of the homogeneous recurrence often gives a useful normalization. An inhomogeneous recurrence may then be solved by summing its normalized increments.
8. Coupled recurrences
Consider
Look for a combination that is geometric:
It has the required coefficient ratio when
For , respectively,
Solving gives
The source switches midway to ; these answers consistently use the stated . If were intended, the corresponding formulas would be and .
For a symmetric system
adding and subtracting directly yields geometric sequences with ratios and . General coupled systems need not always have two independent real geometric combinations; repeated or complex characteristic values require the appropriate additional treatment.
9. A recurrence containing partial sums
Let , and suppose the terms are positive with
For , subtract the equation at and use :
Positivity excludes the second factor being zero. Therefore , and
Conversely, these terms satisfy , so the original partial-sum condition is verified. Without positivity, additional branches would require consideration.
10. Conjecture a formula, then prove it
Let the positive sequence satisfy
The first few terms are , suggesting . A finite list is evidence for a conjecture, not its proof.
The base case is given. Assume for a positive integer . Since , squaring is valid and gives
The positive root is , completing the induction. Thus
Here the implicit equation has exactly one positive root at each step, so the branch choice also proves uniqueness. Guessing and induction are useful beyond these ten patterns, but not every unfamiliar recurrence has a conveniently guessable closed form. The induction guide develops the proof methods in detail, and probability recurrences show why these transformations matter in applications.
Related articles
- Equating rational and irrational parts: proof and worked problems
- How to simplify nested square roots, with three worked examples
- Conditional probability: the formula, information protocols, and worked examples
- Integration by parts: formulas, proof, and four useful patterns
- Triple-angle identities: remember, derive, and apply them
About the author
Koki Saito
Physician and graduate of the University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine. Drawing on his entrance-exam experience, he explains how to choose mathematical methods and construct complete solutions.
Full profile →Have a question or spotted an error? Contact us.