The fundamental theorem of calculus in integral equations

Original publication: Updated:

Differentiating an accumulated integral

If ff is continuous on an interval containing aa and xx, the fundamental theorem of calculus gives

ddx∫axf(t) dt=f(x).\frac{d}{dx}\int_a^x f(t)\,dt=f(x).

To see why, put F(x)=∫axf(t) dtF(x)=\int_a^x f(t)\,dt. For nonzero hh,

F(x+h)−F(x)h=1h∫xx+hf(t) dt.\frac{F(x+h)-F(x)}h=\frac1h\int_x^{x+h}f(t)\,dt.

Continuity makes this average tend to f(x)f(x) as h→0h\to0, from either side. The corresponding evaluation rule says that if G′=fG'=f, then ∫abf(t) dt=G(b)−G(a)\int_a^bf(t)\,dt=G(b)-G(a).

When a limit is itself a function, apply the chain rule:

ddx∫a2xf(t) dt=2f(2x).\frac{d}{dx}\int_a^{2x}f(t)\,dt=2f(2x).

More generally, for differentiable g,hg,h and continuous ff on the relevant interval,

ddx∫g(x)h(x)f(t) dt=h′(x)f(h(x))−g′(x)f(g(x)).\boxed{\frac{d}{dx}\int_{g(x)}^{h(x)}f(t)\,dt =h'(x)f(h(x))-g'(x)f(g(x)).}

This formula assumes the integrand depends on tt alone. If it also depends explicitly on xx, that dependence needs an additional term under suitable hypotheses. See the chain rule.

Two common applications

For an integral recurrence such as fn+1(x)=1+∫0xfn(t) dtf_{n+1}(x)=1+\int_0^xf_n(t)\,dt, differentiation gives fn+1′=fnf_{n+1}'=f_n.

For an integral equation, first distinguish a fixed-limit integral—which may be an unknown constant—from an integral with a variable endpoint. In the second case, differentiating can reveal an equation for the unknown function. Keep an initial condition from the original equation: differentiation loses constant information. Finally substitute your answer back to establish sufficiency.

Example 1: a polynomial integral equation

Find the polynomial ff satisfying, for every real xx,

x4+2x3−2x2+xf(x)−∫1xf(t) dt=0.x^4+2x^3-2x^2+xf(x)-\int_1^xf(t)\,dt=0.

At x=1x=1, the integral vanishes and f(1)=−1f(1)=-1. Differentiate:

4x3+6x2−4x+f(x)+xf′(x)−f(x)=0,4x^3+6x^2-4x+f(x)+xf'(x)-f(x)=0,

so

x{f′(x)+4x2+6x−4}=0.x\{f'(x)+4x^2+6x-4\}=0.

For x≠0x\ne0, the bracket is zero. Since it is a polynomial, the same identity holds at zero as well. Integrating,

f(x)=−43x3−3x2+4x+C.f(x)=-\frac43x^3-3x^2+4x+C.

The condition f(1)=−1f(1)=-1 gives C=−2/3C=-2/3, hence

f(x)=−43x3−3x2+4x−23.\boxed{f(x)=-\frac43x^3-3x^2+4x-\frac23.}

For this polynomial, the derivative of the original left side is zero and its value at x=1x=1 is zero. It therefore satisfies the original equation for all real xx.

Example 2: two unknown functions

Let ff be differentiable and gg a cubic polynomial, with

∫0xf(t) dt=xf(x)+g(x)\int_0^xf(t)\,dt=xf(x)+g(x)

for every real xx. Suppose gg has a local extremum at x=1/2x=1/2 and g(1)=1/3g(1)=1/3. Find gg, and then find ff if f(1)=5f(1)=5.

At zero, g(0)=0g(0)=0. Differentiating gives

g′(x)=−xf′(x),g'(x)=-xf'(x),

so g′(0)=0g'(0)=0. The extremum also gives g′(1/2)=0g'(1/2)=0. Since g′g' is a genuine quadratic, it has the form

g′(x)=ax(x−12),a≠0.g'(x)=ax\left(x-\frac12\right),\qquad a\ne0.

Integration and g(0)=0g(0)=0 yield g(x)=ax3/3−ax2/4g(x)=ax^3/3-ax^2/4. Its value at one is a/12=1/3a/12=1/3, so

g(x)=43x3−x2.\boxed{g(x)=\frac43x^3-x^2.}

Its derivative 2x(2x−1)2x(2x-1) changes sign at 1/21/2, confirming the extremum.

For x≠0x\ne0, the differential equation now gives f′(x)=−4x+2f'(x)=-4x+2. Thus on each side of zero, f(x)=−2x2+2x+Cf(x)=-2x^2+2x+C. Differentiability implies continuity at zero, so the two constants coincide. The condition at one gives

f(x)=−2x2+2x+5.\boxed{f(x)=-2x^2+2x+5.}

Direct substitution verifies

∫0xf(t) dt=−23x3+x2+5x=xf(x)+g(x).\int_0^xf(t)\,dt=-\frac23x^3+x^2+5x=xf(x)+g(x).

This argument justifies the point x=0x=0 instead of dividing by zero or assuming that differentiability alone implies a continuous derivative.

Example 3: an integral recurrence

Define

f0(x)=1,fn+1(x)=1+∫0xfn(t) dt(n≥0).f_0(x)=1,\qquad f_{n+1}(x)=1+\int_0^xf_n(t)\,dt\quad(n\ge0).

Find fnf_n. Prove that fn(x)>0f_n(x)>0 for every real xx when nn is even, and that fn(x)=0f_n(x)=0 has exactly one real solution when nn is odd.

The first few functions are 11, 1+x1+x, and 1+x+x2/21+x+x^2/2. Induction gives

fn(x)=∑k=0nxkk!.\boxed{f_n(x)=\sum_{k=0}^n\frac{x^k}{k!}.}

Indeed, integrating the sum for fnf_n term by term and adding one produces the sum for fn+1f_{n+1}. The recurrence also immediately gives fn′=fn−1f_n'=f_{n-1} for n≥1n\ge1.

For the sign and root claims, start with f0=1>0f_0=1>0. Suppose f2m>0f_{2m}>0 everywhere. Then f2m+1′=f2m>0f_{2m+1}'=f_{2m}>0, so this odd-degree polynomial is strictly increasing. Its limits at the two infinities have opposite signs, and f2m+1(0)=1f_{2m+1}(0)=1, so it has exactly one real root α<0\alpha<0.

Next f2m+2′=f2m+1f_{2m+2}'=f_{2m+1} is negative before α\alpha and positive afterward. Thus f2m+2f_{2m+2} has a global minimum at α\alpha, and

f2m+2(α)=f2m+1(α)+α2m+2(2m+2)!=α2m+2(2m+2)!>0.f_{2m+2}(\alpha)=f_{2m+1}(\alpha)+\frac{\alpha^{2m+2}}{(2m+2)!} =\frac{\alpha^{2m+2}}{(2m+2)!}>0.

This proves the even assertion for the next index and completes both claims by induction. The fundamental theorem turns the integral recurrence into a particularly simple relationship between consecutive derivatives.

Related articles

About the author

Koki Saito

Physician and graduate of the University of Tokyo Faculty of Medicine. Drawing on his entrance-exam experience, he explains how to choose mathematical methods and construct complete solutions.

Full profile →

Have a question or spotted an error? Contact us.